Works with Zoom, Meet and Teams
Nothing to install
โWhat should this study answer?โ
Draft
Drafting tasks and questions for you to reviewโฆ
1. Plan your study
P04
You
Fibi
2. Run your sessions
โSeen in 4 of 6 sessionsโ
Study deck ready to share
3. Share your findings
SET UP THE STUDY
Choose an access level
Task 2
Area to explore: what people expect each role to allow.
Select access that lets a teammate contribute without managing billing.
Success criterion
What did you expect this role to let your teammate do?
Follow-up question
Give every task a purpose
Participant groups
6
Workspace invitations study
New workspace admins
4 participants
Invite a teammate ยท Choose an access level
Existing admins
1 participant
Choose an access level
Participant 06
Unassigned
Needs a task set before the session
Give each participant the right tasks
Session details
Study record
Workspace invitations ยท used in every session
Consent wording
Ready to post
Posted in the meeting chat at the start of each session.
Consent
45 minute sessions
Session length
Roles: you moderate, a teammate reviews the evidence.
Team roles
Keep the session details together
Study draft review
3 suggestions
Fibi Research ยท reviewed your draft
Task 2 scenario is unclear
Apply
Say who the teammate is and what they need to do in the workspace.
Task 1 has no success criterion
Apply
Suggested: the invitation is sent without help.
Missing document
Flagged
Add the current roles and permissions page.
Fix unclear tasks before the session
BEFORE THE SESSION
View
Post your consent message
Get answers on demand
Check whatโs left to cover
Keep the call quiet
Protect participant names
AFTER THE SESSION

Workspace invitations - P-04
Completed
Zoom
Illustrative session
44 mins
P-04 ยท New admin
Details
Actions
WHAT THEY DID
The participant sent the invitation unaided. They chose an access level after asking the moderator what Editor could change.
SCENARIO RESULTS
T-01 ยท Invite
Finished without help
T-02 ยท Choose a role
Finished with help
Participant
P-04
Segment
New admin
NEW THIS SESSION
What they said
โI thought Editor meant they could change billing too.โ
What they did
- Opened the role menu twice before choosing
- Asked what Editor could change, then chose it
Sample data
Quotes and outcomes in this example are illustrative.
Generated by Fibi Research
Scenario results
Session 04
Role basics ยท P-04
T-01 ยท Invite a teammate
Finished without help
Sent the invitation from workspace settings in 1m 50s.
Setup
1m 50s
T-02 ยท Choose an access level
Finished with help
Asked what Editor could change, then chose it in 3m 10s.
See where participants got stuck
Said and did ยท T-02
Differs
P-04 ยท Session 04
What they said
Said
โChoosing a role was easy.โ
What you observed
Did
Opened the role menu twice and asked for help
Where it differs
Review
Stated ease, observed hesitation
Illustrative example
Compare what they said and did
Findings
1 waiting
Stronger as more participants say the same thing.
F-01 ยท Editor includes billing
3 of 4 ยท Confirmed
โI thought Editor meant they could change billing too.โ
Needs something
P-04
F-04 ยท Wants role details first
1 waiting
Proposed match from Session 04. No count moves until you decide.
Spot patterns across sessions
VERBATIMS AND NOTES
QUOTES ยท CODES, NOT NAMES
โI thought Editor meant they could change billing too.โ
P-04 ยท T-02
โIโd want to see what each role can do first.โ
P-04 ยท T-02
YOUR NOTES ยท ONLY YOU CAN SEE THESE
Hesitated at the role menu. Probe role labels next time.
Moderator note ยท Private
Check whether the role help text was visible.
Moderator note ยท Private
Keep the exact words
How your sessions are going
Workspace invitations ยท 3 coached sessions
74
average
Facilitation score
Not enough sessions yet
Question neutrality
72
Holding up ยท 25% of the score ยท Based on 3 sessions
Observed over stated
84.7
Holding up ยท 20% of the score ยท Based on 3 sessions
Task discipline
70
Holding up ยท 20% of the score ยท Based on 3 sessions
Silence and non-interruption
71.3
Holding up ยท 15% of the score ยท Based on 3 sessions
Disconfirmation
68.3
Worth watching ยท 10% of the score ยท Based on 3 sessions
Frame and task coverage
77.3
Holding up ยท 10% of the score ยท Based on 3 sessions
WORK ON THIS NEXT
Rewrite your opening probes as โWhat did you do next?โ questions.
QUESTION NEUTRALITY ยท SEEN IN P-04
One score, six weighted skills
Habits in your sessions
3 sessions
Moments Fibi keeps flagging across your sessions.
Held the silence
Habit to keep
Seen 2 times ยท in 2 of your recent sessions
P-04
46:10
Helped too early
Habit to drop
Seen once ยท in 1 of your recent sessions. Try: wait, then ask what they expected.
T-02
18:42
Asked a leading question
Habit to drop
Seen 2 times ยท in 2 of your recent sessions. Try: โWhat were you looking for?โ
P-03
52:05
Review coachable moments
Observed over stated
2 to revisit
Where an observation gave you stronger evidence than a hypothetical answer.
Watched the role choice
Observed
You asked them to choose a role and watched what they did.
observed
08:15
Accepted โIโd probablyโฆโ
Needs follow-up
A hypothetical answer stood in for behavior. Ask them to show you.
hypothetical
31:05
Took praise as proof
Needs follow-up
โThis looks greatโ is not evidence the task works.
stated
22:40
Look for what people actually do
Work on this next
Fibi's one pick
The dimension with the most evidence behind it.
โWhat were you looking for when you opened the role menu?โ
Holding up
Ask what they expected, and let them answer in their own words.
P-04
06:55
โWas that easy?โ
Habit to drop
Try: โWhat were you looking for when you opened the role menu?โ
T-02
18:42
Ask more neutral questions
Airtime and silence
Illustrative
How much of the session you spoke, and where you waited.
You spoke 18%
Participant led
The participant spoke most of the session. Longest pause you held: 9 seconds.
You
1,050 words ยท 18%
Participant 04
4,780 words ยท 82%
Fibi
96 words ยท 1%
Leave room for silence

Sessions โ evidence โ one study board
01
Participant 01
Session 01 ยท New workspace admin
Session
Expected billing access
Quote
Chose Viewer, then switched
Request
03
Participant 03
Session 03 ยท New workspace admin
Session
Expected billing access
Matches finding
Abandoned Task 2
Task outcome
04
Participant 04
Session 04 ยท New workspace admin
Session
Said Editor includes billing
Quote
Match awaiting review
Proposed match
WI
Workspace invitations
Study board ยท Illustrative example
Study board
Updated after every session
Finding
4 of 6 participants
Participants expected Editor to include billing access.
Sessions
6 sessions
Participants 01 to 06
Next steps
2
Open
Evidence
4 of 6 participants
Quote
Task outcome
PARTICIPANT REQUESTS 2
Show what each role allows
Request
Open
Asked in Session 01.
Explain billing access
Request
Task outcome
Asked in Session 04.
Proposed match from Session 04
โI thought Editor meant they could change billing too.โ
Matches: Participants expected Editor to include billing access.
Every session adds evidence to the same board.
User researchers
Product designers
Product managers
Founders and small product teams
SHARE THE STUDY
Study deck ยท Workspace invitations
WI
Research question
ยท Slide 1
built by
Fibi
Can new workspace admins invite a teammate and choose the right access level? Finding: participants expected Editor to include billing access (4 of 6 participants).
Next steps ยท Workspace invitations
Open
Ask the next participant to explain each role
Done
Add the roles and permissions page
Dismissed
Test a clearer Editor label
Finding
4 of 6 participants
Quote
โEditor meant billing too.โ
Participant 04 ยท Session 04
View evidence
Fibi
sessions
6 sessions in one study. Participant names never appear in the deck.
Study progress ยท 6 sessions
A deck that never names participants
The study deck shows findings, counts and anonymous quotes. Participant names stay in the permission-controlled study record.
Share your study in one deck
Show what backs each finding
Know what to test next
Works with Zoom, Meet and Teams
Nothing to install





















